Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSBS
  • E-Submission

Plant Breed. Biotech. : Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Research Article

Optimization of Temperature Regime to Screen Cold Tolerant Rice Seedlings

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 2016;4(2):176-187.
Published online: May 31, 2016

1Chun Cheon Branch, NICS, RDA, Chuncheon 24219, Korea

2Central Area Crop Breeding Division, NICS, RDA, Suweon 16429, Korea

3Crop Breeding Division, NICS, RDA, Jeonju 55365, Korea

4Technology cooperation Bureau, RDA, Jeonju 55365, Korea

5Applied Plant Sciences Program Division of Bioresource Sciences. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea

*Corresponding author: Cheol-Seong Jang, csjang@kangwon.ac.kr, Tel: +82-33-250-7221, Fax: +82-33-259-5558
• Received: May 3, 2016   • Revised: May 13, 2016   • Accepted: May 16, 2016

Copyright © 2016 The Korean Society of Breeding Science

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 10 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 5 Crossref
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Genome-wide Association Study for Cold Tolerance at Seedling Stage Using a Core Collection of Korean Rice
    Sa-Eun Park, Ngoc Ha Luong, Sang-Nag Ahn, Kyu-Chan Shim
    Journal of Agriculture & Life Science.2025; 59(2): 13.     CrossRef
  • Identification of QTLs Related to Plant Growth at Low Temperatures in the Seedling Stage of Tongil Type Rice after Transplanting
    Seong-Gyu Jang, Ji-Yoon Lee, Ju-Won Kang, Youngho Kwon, So-Myeong Lee, Sais-Beul Lee, Jun-Hyeon Cho, Dong-Soo Park, Jong-Hee Lee, Soon-Wook Kwon, Sumin Jo
    Korean Journal of Breeding Science.2024; 56(3): 225.     CrossRef
  • Haplotype analysis of Tongil-type rice varieties through sequence polymorphism analysis of cold tolerance-enhancing genes
    Youngeun Lee, Sais-Beul Lee, Ju-Won Kang, Jun-Hyeon Cho, Dong-Soo Park, Jong-Hee Lee, Dongjin Shin, Byung Jun Jin
    Journal of Plant Biotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Temporal Changes of Leaf Spectral Properties and Rapid Chlorophyll—A Fluorescence under Natural Cold Stress in Rice Seedlings
    Árpád Székely, Tímea Szalóki, Mihály Jancsó, János Pauk, Csaba Lantos
    Plants.2023; 12(13): 2415.     CrossRef
  • Efficient Cold Tolerance Evaluation of Four Species of Liliaceae Plants through Cell Death Measurement and Lethal Temperature Prediction
    Woo-Hyeong Yang, Seong-Hyeon Yong, Dong-Jin Park, Sung-Jin Ahn, Do-Hyun Kim, Kwan-Been Park, Eon-Ju Jin, Myung-Suk Choi
    Horticulturae.2023; 9(7): 751.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Optimization of Temperature Regime to Screen Cold Tolerant Rice Seedlings
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2016;4(2):176-187.   Published online May 31, 2016
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Optimization of Temperature Regime to Screen Cold Tolerant Rice Seedlings
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2016;4(2):176-187.   Published online May 31, 2016
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
Optimization of Temperature Regime to Screen Cold Tolerant Rice Seedlings
Image Image
Fig. 1 The reaction extent of discoloration and wilting for each treatment (A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air) for 10 days at the 3rd-leaf stage.
Fig. 2 The analysis of correlation between Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value and visual scoring. z)A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air. y)**: Highly significant at 0.01 probability level. x)ns: not significant.
Optimization of Temperature Regime to Screen Cold Tolerant Rice Seedlings

Rice cultivars selected for this study and their visual scores of seedling cold tolerance for 10 years.

Maturity Cultivar Visual scoring Tolerant level Group
Early Joun 3.8±0.92 Tolerant Japonica
Seolak 3.3±0.48 Tolerant Japonica
Keumo 5.4±0.84 Moderate Japonica
Medium-Late Dongan 4.3±0.95 Slightly tolerant Japonica
Dasan 7.8±0.79 Slightly sensitive Tongil
Saetbyeol 9.0±0.00 Sensitive Tongil

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

The conditions of each low temperature stress treatment at the seedling stage of rice.

Treatment Mean water temperature (ºC) Mean air temperature (ºC) Remark
‘A’ 12±1 33±14 Hot condition (practice)
‘B’ 12±1 24±7 Natural condition
‘C’ 17±1 24±7 Natural condition
‘D’ 17±1 33±14 Hot condition
‘E’ 24±5 24±7 Natural condition (control)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

The ANOVA table for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value.

Source DFz) SS Mean square F-value Pr>F
Cv 5 2,781.786052 556.357810 108.58 <0.0001
Tr 4 4,691.150458 1,172.787615 228.88 <0.0001
Cv x tr 20 1,141.147542 57.057377 11.14 <0.0001

z)DF: degree of freedom, SS: sum of squares, Cv: Cultivar, Tr: Treatment, Cv x tr: Interaction between cultivar and treatment.

Duncan’s multiple range test for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value of treatments.

Treatment Joun Seolak Dongan Keumo Saetbyeol Dasan
‘A’z) 23.8a±2.1 19.3b±1.7 20.1b±3.3 16.8c±1.6 8.9d±2.3 6.9d±1.6
‘B’ 20.7a±3.5 15.6b±1.8 14.4b±3.5 14.6b±2.0 5.6c±1.9 7.1c±2.1
‘C’ 26.5a±1.8 24.8a±1.7 21.9b±2.0 21.6b±1.0 17.5c±1.8 19.1c±3.1
‘D’ 25.4a±3.0 24.4a±2.3 23.1ab±1.9 21.0bc±2.1 18.7c±1.5 19.6c±3.8
‘E’ 24.2b±2.1 28.2a±1.8 23.9b±1.3 25.9b±2.6 24.1b±2.1 24.0b±1.7

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

z)A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, α=0.05.

Duncan’s multiple range test for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value of cultivars.

Cultivar Treatment

‘A’z) ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ ‘E’
Keumo 16.8c±1.6 14.6d±2.0 21.6b±1.0 21.0b±2.1 25.9a±2.6
Saetbyeol 8.9c±2.3 5.6d±1.9 17.5b±1.8 18.7b±1.5 24.1a±2.1
Seolak 19.3c±1.7 15.6d±1.8 24.8b±1.7 24.4b±2.3 28.2a±1.8
Joun 23.8a±2.1 20.7b±3.5 26.5a±1.8 25.4a±3.0 24.2a±2.1
Dongan 20.1b±3.3 14.4c±3.5 21.9ab±2.0 23.1a±1.9 23.9a±1.3
Dasan 6.9c±1.6 7.1c±2.1 19.1b±3.1 19.6b±3.8 24.0a±1.7

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

z)A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC meanwater with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, α=0.05.

The ANOVA table for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value analyzed by dividing Tongil and Japonica group.

Group Source DFz) SSy) Mean square F-value Pr>F R square
Tongil Cv 1 3.16 3.2 0.60 0.4419 0.911321
Tr 4 3,761.3 940.3 177.98 <0.0001
Cv x tr 4 36.1 9.0 1.71 0.1576
Japonica Cv 3 414.55 138.18 27.39 <0.0001 0.776199
Tr 4 1,720.99 430.25 85.29 <0.0001
Cv x tr 4 313.86 26.15 5.18 <0.0001

z)DF: degree of freedom,

y)SS: sum of squares, Cv: Cultivar, Tr: Treatment, Cv x tr: Interaction between cultivar and treatment.

Duncan’s multiple range test for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value of Tongil and Japonica group.

Groups Treatments

‘A’c z) ‘B’c ‘C’b ‘D’b ‘E’a
Tongil 7.9±2.2 6.3±2.0 18.3±2.6 19.2±2.8 24.0±1.9
Japonica 20.0±3.4 16.3±3.7 23.7±2.6 23.5±2.8 25.5±2.6

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

z)A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC meanwater with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, α=0.05.

ANOVA table for agronomic traits after 3rd leaf treatment at different water and air temperature.

Trait Source DFz) SSy) Mean square F-value Pr>F
Heading Cv 5 12,015.8 2,403.2 2,338.2 <0.0001
Tr 3 622.8 207.6 202.0 <0.0001
Cv x tr 15 187.2 12.5 12.1 <0.0001
Culm length Cv 5 9,022.6 1,804.5 401.6 <0.0001
Tr 3 71.7 23.9 5.3 0.0023
Cv x tr 15 342.2 22.8 5.1 <0.0001
Panicle length Cv 5 215.1 43.0 22.7 <0.0001
Tr 3 28.5 9.5 5.0 0.0032
Cv x tr 15 68.2 4.5 2.4 0.0071
Tiller number Cv 5 268.7 53.7 29.7 <0.0001
Tr 3 17.9 6.0 3.3 0.0254
Cv x tr 15 28.9 1.9 1.1 0.4017

z)DF: degree of freedom,

y)SS: sum of squares, Cv: Cultivar, Tr: Treatment, Cv x tr: Interaction between cultivar and treatment.

T-test with control, and agronomic traits at the paddy field.

Treatment Cultivar Heading (d) Culm length (cm) Panicle length (cm) Tiller number
‘A’z) Keumo 87**±1.2 58**±1.9 25*±1.0 10±0.7
Dasan ND ND ND ND
Dongan 94**±0.0 59*±1.0 19±1.3 11±1.9
Saetbyeol ND ND ND ND
Seolak 86**±1.2 52±1.6 24±1.8 8±1.3
Joun 80**±0.6 59*±2.8 24±2.0 9±0.7
‘B’ Keumo 86**±0.0 63±2.9 23±2.2 10±1.2
Dasan 117**±0.6 49±1.6 21±0.9 10±1.0
Dongan 95**±0.6 63±0.4 19±0.7 12±1.7
Saetbyeol 107**±4.0 33*±1.5 19±1.4 13±0.7
Seolak 85**±0.0 59±0.6 21±0.6 10±1.1
Joun 80**±0.6 57**±1.1 23±1.3 8±0.8
‘C’ Keumo 84**±0.0 60*±2.0 24±0.7 10±0.9
Dasan 111**±1.7 51±2.6 22±1.8 11±1.2
Dongan 92**±0.0 65±2.1 20±0.7 12±2.0
Saetbyeol 102**±0.6 38±2.0 19±1.0 15±1.4
Seolak 85**±0.0 57±1.4 21±0.6 11±0.5
Joun 81**±0.6 65±1.5 22±0.6 10±1.0
‘D’ Keumo 83*±0.6 65±3.8 24±3.1 11±0.7
Dasan 110**±1.2 51±2.0 23±0.3 11±1.2
Dongan 92**±0.0 63±2.1 20±0.9 13±1.1
Saetbyeol 102**±0.0 34*±1.8 20±0.4 13±0.6
Seolak 85**±0.6 56±1.9 23±2.0 11±0.5
Joun 79**±0.0 61±3.1 24±1.9 9±0.5
‘E’ Keumo 81±0.0 63±1.0 23±1.8 9±2.1
Dasan 106±0.6 49±0.2 21±2.2 10±1.0
Dongan 90±0.0 64±2.7 20±0.3 11±2.1
Saetbyeol 94±1.2 40±4.5 19±1.4 14±0.2
Seolak 79±0.0 55±3.2 22±1.8 11±2.8
Joun 76±0.0 63±1.2 21±0.3 8±1.9

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

z)A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, α=0.05, ND: not determined.

*, **Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.

Duncan’s multiple range test for heading delay of treatments.

Treatment Joun Seolak Dongan Keumo Saetbyeol Dasan
‘A’z) 3.5b±0.6 7.0a±1.2 4.0b±0.0 6.0a±1.2 ND ND
‘B’ 3.5e±0.6 6.0c±0.0 4.5d±0.6 5.0d±0.0 7.5b±0.6 11.0a±0.0
‘C’ 4.5c±0.6 6.0b±0.0 2.0e±0.0 3.0d±0.0 7.5a±0.6 5.0c±1.2
‘D’ 3.0d±0.0 5.5b±0.6 2.0e±0.0 1.5e±0.6 8.0a±1.2 4.5c±0.6

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

z)A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC meanwater with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, α=0.05, ND: not determined.

Duncan’s multiple range test for heading delay of treatments.

Cultivar Treatment

‘A’z) ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’
Keumo 6.0a±1.2 5.0b±0.0 3.0c±0.0 1.5d±0.6
Dongan 4.0b±0.0 4.5a±0.6 2.0c±0.0 2.0c±0.0
Seolak 7.0a±1.2 6.0ab±0.0 6.0ab±0.0 5.5b±0.6
Joun 3.5b±0.6 3.5b±0.6 4.5a±0.6 3.0b±0.0
Saetbyeol ND 7.5a±0.6 7.5a±0.6 8.0a±1.2
Dasan ND 11.0a±0.0 5.0b±1.2 4.5b±0.6

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

z)A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, α=0.05, ND: not determined.

Table 1 Rice cultivars selected for this study and their visual scores of seedling cold tolerance for 10 years.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Table 2 The conditions of each low temperature stress treatment at the seedling stage of rice.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Table 3 The ANOVA table for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value.

DF: degree of freedom, SS: sum of squares, Cv: Cultivar, Tr: Treatment, Cv x tr: Interaction between cultivar and treatment.

Table 4 Duncan’s multiple range test for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value of treatments.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, α=0.05.

Table 5 Duncan’s multiple range test for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value of cultivars.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC meanwater with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, α=0.05.

Table 6 The ANOVA table for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value analyzed by dividing Tongil and Japonica group.

DF: degree of freedom,

SS: sum of squares, Cv: Cultivar, Tr: Treatment, Cv x tr: Interaction between cultivar and treatment.

Table 7 Duncan’s multiple range test for Soil and Plant Analyzer Development (SPAD) value of Tongil and Japonica group.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC meanwater with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, α=0.05.

Table 8 ANOVA table for agronomic traits after 3rd leaf treatment at different water and air temperature.

DF: degree of freedom,

SS: sum of squares, Cv: Cultivar, Tr: Treatment, Cv x tr: Interaction between cultivar and treatment.

Table 9 T-test with control, and agronomic traits at the paddy field.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, E: 23ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, α=0.05, ND: not determined.

Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.

Table 10 Duncan’s multiple range test for heading delay of treatments.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC meanwater with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, α=0.05, ND: not determined.

Table 11 Duncan’s multiple range test for heading delay of treatments.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences, as calculated statistically by Duncan’s multiple range tests.

A: 12ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, B: 12ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, C: 17ºC mean water with 24ºC mean air, D: 17ºC mean water with 33ºC mean air, α=0.05, ND: not determined.