Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSBS
  • E-Submission

Plant Breed. Biotech. : Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Research Article

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Improvement of Major Rice Variety TBR225 for Low Cadmium Accumulation

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 2025;13:71-83.
Published online: April 25, 2025

1Department of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Genetics, Vietnam Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hanoi, Vietnam

2Department of Plant Science, Faculty of Biology, VNU-University of Science, Vietnam National University in Hanoi, Vietnam

3Center for Life Sciences Research, Faculty of Biology, VNU-University of Science, Vietnam National University in Hanoi, Vietnam

*Corresponding to Mai Quynh Le TEL. +84-9-4748-5588, E-mail. lequynhmai80@vnu.edu.vn
• Received: December 5, 2024   • Revised: March 6, 2025   • Accepted: April 7, 2025

Copyright © 2025 by the Korean Society of Breeding Science

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 40 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 7 Crossref
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Genome editing in rice: toward climate-resilient, nutrient-rich yields
    Xin Huang, Wenshu He, Ludovic Bassie, Paul Christou, Teresa Capell
    Trends in Plant Science.2026; 31(7): 925.     CrossRef
  • CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) for Multi-Stress Resilience and Prospects for Agricultural Sustainability
    Abdul Malik, Nur Ardiyana Rejab, Muhamad Afiq Aziz
    Journal of Crop Health.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Engineering Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants Using CRISPR Cas: From Molecular Targets to Physiological Resilience
    Komal Sharma, Upma Bhatt, Vineet Soni
    Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition.2026; 26(2): 4593.     CrossRef
  • Exploring Flooding Challenges, Causes, and Mitigation Strategies in Rice
    Abdoul-Razak Oumarou Mahamane, Junior S. Kamara, Moise Hubert Byiringiro, Alpha Sow, Khaled F. M. Salem
    International Journal of Genomics.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Liebig Review: Essential and Beneficial Elements in the Regulation of Cadmium Uptake and Tolerance in Crop Plants
    Maria Manzoor, Karl Hermann Mühling
    Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Genome Editing for Enhancing Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice: An Omics Guided Perspective
    Mahavir Joshi, Pari Panwar, Smile Sharma, Bharat Sagar, Sukhminderjit Kaur, Manikant Tripathi
    Molecular Biotechnology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Harnessing breeding and biotechnological innovations for global food security under climate change
    Obaid Ur Rehman, Feifei Zhu, Xinjuan Hu, Xiangru Xu, Muhammad Uzair, Jiangya Qian, Sajid Fiaz, Shuhao Huo
    Functional & Integrative Genomics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Improvement of Major Rice Variety TBR225 for Low Cadmium Accumulation
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2025;13:71-83.   Published online April 25, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Improvement of Major Rice Variety TBR225 for Low Cadmium Accumulation
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2025;13:71-83.   Published online April 25, 2025
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Improvement of Major Rice Variety TBR225 for Low Cadmium Accumulation
Image Image Image Image
Fig. 1 PCR analysis of transgene integration in T0 (a) and T1 (b) generations using specific primer pairs for OsActin (endogenous control), HPT (marker gene), gRNA, and Ubiquitin::Cas9 expression cassette. C: positive control (pCas9/sgRNA-OsNRAMP5 in T0; parental DNA in T1); WT: wild-type plant; M: 1.0 kb ladder.
Fig. 2 Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations in TBR225 OsNRAMP5. (a) Schematic diagram of OsNRAMP5 gene structure showing two target sites on exon 1. Black rectangles: exons; lines: introns and UTRs. (b) OsNRAMP5 allele alignment of T0 lines (L1, L4, L22) and their T1 progeny (L1.59, L4.28, L22.21) in the target region. (c) Predicted amino acid sequences of OsNRAMP5 mutant alleles. Boxes: gRNA target sites; arrows: predicted CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs; asterisks: stop codons. Left column: rice line names (a1, a2: allele 1, 2; WT: wild-type). Right column in (b): genotype (+/-: insertions/deletions; numbers: modified nucleotide count; capital letters: altered nucleotides; wt: wild-type). Right column in (c): polypeptide length. []: base pair or amino acid counts.
Fig. 3 Metal accumulation in OsNRAMP5-edited TBR225 rice lines under different metal treatments. Plants were exposed to various metal concentrations for 2 months (a-d) or 3 months (e). (a) Fe concentrations in grain after treatments with 0, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mM FeCl2. (b) Zn concentrations in grain after treatments with 0, 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 mM ZnCl2. (c-e) Cd concentrations in root (c), shoot (d), and grain (e) after treatments with 0, 30, and 300 µM CdCl2. Bars represent mean±SD from 3 biological replicates. WT: wild-type plant. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to WT (Tukey's HSD test; p<0.05).
Fig. 4 Agronomic trait analysis of OsNRAMP5 mutants. Three mutant lines (L1.59, L4.28, and L22.21) and WT plants were cultivated in green-house condition. (a) Plant morphology. (b) Time duration. (c) Plan height. (d) Number of tilters per plant. (e) Number of filled grains per panicle. (f) Individual grain yield. (g) Amylose content in grain. Data are means±SD. There is no significant difference between WT and mutant lines (Tukey's HSD test; p<0.05).
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Improvement of Major Rice Variety TBR225 for Low Cadmium Accumulation

Result of TBR225 rice transformation

Experiment No. sample Ratio (%)z
Agrobacterium-innoculated callus 5063 -
Hygromycin-resistant callus 1598 36.71
Regenerated plant 134 3.08
Plant with positive OsActin PCR 134 3.08
Plant with positive HPT PCR 49 1.13
Plant with positive gRNA PCR 49 1.13
Plant with positive Cas9 PCR 49 1.13

Frequency of OsNRAMP5 mutant genotypes in T0 transgenic plants

Location Mutant genotype ratiosz

Heterozygous Homozygous Bialellic wt
gRNA1 1/20 2/20 4/20 13/20
gRNA2 3/20 2/20 1/20 14/20
gRNA1-gRNA2 1/20 1/20 5/20 13/20

Frequency of OsNRAMP5 mutation types in T0 transgenic plants

Location Mutant type ratiosz

Deletion Insertion Substitution
gRNA1 12/14 0/14 1/14
gRNA2 3/12 6/12 0/12

Segregation of T-DNA in T1 generation

T0 plant Genotypez No. of T1 plants tested T-DNA inheritance Mutation inheritance No. of T-DNA-free mutant plantsx


No. of T-DNA-free plants χ2 (3:1)y χ2 (15:1)y No. of homozygous plants χ2 (1:1)y
L1 Bialellic 60 11 1.422 14.951 37 3.267 7
L4 Bialellic 60 19 1.422 66.151 24 2.400 2
L9 Bialellic 60 3 12.8 0.16 31 0.067 2
L10 Heterozygous 37 8 0.225 14.921 13w 3.270 0
L22 Bialellic 60 11 1.422 14.951 35 1.667 6
Table 1 Result of TBR225 rice transformation

zNumber of positive samples/total Agrobacterium-inoculated calli)×100%. HPT: Hygromycin phospho transferase marker gene.

Table 2 Frequency of OsNRAMP5 mutant genotypes in T0 transgenic plants

zNumber of genotypes/total number of tested plants.

Table 3 Frequency of OsNRAMP5 mutation types in T0 transgenic plants

zNumber of alleles with a specific mutation type/total number of alleles in all mutant plants

Table 4 Segregation of T-DNA in T1 generation

zGenotype notation of OsNRAMP5 mutation: (+/-) indicates nucleotide insertion/deletion; capital letters represent substituted nucleotides; (wt) denotes wild-type allele; (sub) indicates nucleotide substitution; numbers represent the length of insertion or deletion in base pairs; (||) separates the two alleles; (/) separates the two gRNA mutation sites.

yχ2 critical value (df=1, p<0,05)=3,841.

xNumber of T-DNA-free homozygous mutant plants.

wIncludes both mutant (5) and wild-type plants (8).