Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSBS
  • E-Submission

Plant Breed. Biotech. : Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Research Article

FISH Karyotype Comparison between Wild and Cultivated Perilla Species Using 5S and 45S rDNA Probes

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 2019;7(3):237-244.
Published online: September 1, 2019

1Chromosome Research Institute, Department of Life Science, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea

2Genomics Division, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Jeonju 54874, Korea

*Hyun Hee Kim, kimhh@syu.ac.kr, Tel: +82-2-3399-1715, Fax: +82-2-3399-1729
• Received: July 12, 2019   • Revised: August 19, 2019   • Accepted: August 19, 2019

Copyright © 2019 The Korean Society of Breeding Science

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 15 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 6 Crossref
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Cytogenomic profiling of Panax ginseng cultivars and in vitro root cultures through multi-color PLOP-FISH and flow cytometry reveals somaclonal variations
    Eliazar A. Peniton Jr., Hong T. Nguyen, Nomar E. Waminal, Tae-Jin Yang, Hyun Hee Kim
    Journal of Ginseng Research.2026; 50(4): 101058.     CrossRef
  • Cytogenomic evaluation of regenerated Aralia elata using PLOP-FISH and flow cytometry
    Eliazar Alumbro Peniton, Hong Thi Nguyen, Nomar Espinosa Waminal, Tae-Jin Yang, Hyun Hee Kim
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative triple-color FISH mapping and genome size advances understanding of the cytogenetic diversity in wild Solanum species
    Hong Thi Nguyen, Soon Ju Park, Byung Yong Kang, Hyun Hee Kim
    Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology.2023; 64(5): 811.     CrossRef
  • Comparative FISH analysis of Senna tora tandem repeats revealed insights into the chromosome dynamics in Senna
    Thanh Dat Ta, Nomar Espinosa Waminal, Thi Hong Nguyen, Remnyl Joyce Pellerin, Hyun Hee Kim
    Genes & Genomics.2021; 43(3): 237.     CrossRef
  • Comparative triple-color FISH mapping in eleven Senna species using rDNA and telomeric repeat probes
    Thi Hong Nguyen, Nomar Espinosa Waminal, Do Sin Lee, Remnyl Joyce Pellerin, Thanh Dat Ta, Nicole Bon Campomayor, Byung Yong Kang, Hyun Hee Kim
    Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology.2021; 62(6): 927.     CrossRef
  • FISH Karyotype Comparison ofPlatycodon grandiflorus(Jacq.) A. DC. ‘Jangbaek’ and Its Colchicine-Induced Tetraploid ‘Etteumbaek
    Eliazar Alumbro Peniton Jr., Yurry Um, Hyun Hee Kim
    Plant Breeding and Biotechnology.2020; 8(4): 389.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

FISH Karyotype Comparison between Wild and Cultivated Perilla Species Using 5S and 45S rDNA Probes
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2019;7(3):237-244.   Published online September 1, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
FISH Karyotype Comparison between Wild and Cultivated Perilla Species Using 5S and 45S rDNA Probes
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2019;7(3):237-244.   Published online September 1, 2019
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
FISH Karyotype Comparison between Wild and Cultivated Perilla Species Using 5S and 45S rDNA Probes
Image Image
Fig. 1 Dual-color FISH metaphases of Perilla citriodora (A) and P. frutescens (B) showing the 5S (green) and 45S (white) rDNA signals. Bar = 5 μm.
Fig. 2 FISH karyotypic idiogram of diploid Perilla citriodora (A) and allotetraploid P. frutescens (B) showing 20 homologous pairs arranged in decreasing lengths. Bar = 5 μm.
FISH Karyotype Comparison between Wild and Cultivated Perilla Species Using 5S and 45S rDNA Probes

FISH karyotype data of Perilla citriodora showing its per chromosome length, arm ratio, type, and rDNAs signals.

Chr. pair no. Chromosome length (μm) Arm ratio (L/S) Chromosome type FISH signal


Short arm (S) Long arm (L) Total (S + L) 5S 45S
1 2.42–2.43 2.48–2.49 4.91–4.92 1.02–1.03 m††
2 1.31–1.41 3.24–3.46 4.55–4.87 2.45–2.47 sm††
3 1.31–1.37 3.05–3.06 4.36–4.43 2.24–2.33 sm* two chromosomes
4 1.73–1.84 2.36–2.42 4.15–4.20 1.29–1.40 m
5 1.03–1.06 3.02–3.03 4.06–4.08 2.85–2.95 sm
6 1.62–1.64 1.94–1.97 3.58–3.59 1.19–1.21 m
7 1.03–1.04 2.43–2.47 3.46–3.49 1.45–2.40 sm two chromosomes
8 1.35–1.38 2.01–2.06 3.40–3.41 1.45–1.53 m
9 1.38–1.46 1.87–1.91 3.29–3.32 2.28–1.38 m
10 1.38–1.42 1.69–1.71 3.07–3.13 1.21–1.22 m
total 12m + 8sm two chromosomes two chromosomes

Submetacentric,

††Metacentric,

*Satellite. +: rDNA signal is present, −: absent.

FISH karyotype data of Perilla frutescens showing its per chromosome length, arm ratio, type, and rDNAs signals.

Chr. group no. Chromosome Length (μm) Arm ratio (L/S) Chromosome type FISH signal


Short arm (S) Long arm (L) Total (S + L) 5S 45S
1 1.39–1.48 4.03–4.24 5.42–5.73 2.86–2.28 sm
2 1.28–1.48 3.36–3.81 4.96–5.09 2.11–2.97 sm
3 2.09–2.10 2.81–2.87 4.90–4.95 1.34–1.37 m††
4 2.09–2.12 2.82–2.87 4.94–4.95 1.33–1.34 m
5 1.92–2.11 2.73–2.85 4.77–4.83 1.29–1.48 m
6 2.13–2.16 2.33–2.36 4.49–4.50 1.08–1.11 m
7 1.37–1.55 2.94–2.98 4.36–4.48 1.90–2.18 sm two chromosomes
8 1.99–2.11 2.26–2.42 4.37–4.41 1.07–1.22 m
9 2.01–2.02 2.35–2.38 4.35–4.39 1.17–1.19 m
10 1.86–1.96 2.31–2.32 4.17–4.27 1.18–1.25 m
11 1.80–1.98 2.16–2.35 4.14–4.15 1.09–1.31 m
12 1.08–1.33 2.75–3.02 3.99–4.10 2.06–2.78 sm
13 1.17–1.21 2.79–2.82 3.99–4.00 2.30–2.41 sm
14 1.42–1.64 2.23–2.40 3.82–3.87 1.36–1.68 m
15 1.70–1.81 2.00–2.09 3.79–3.81 1.10–1.23 m
16 1.00–1.18 2.49–2.58 3.58–3.68 2.11–2.57 sm
17 0.89–0.90 2.58–2.66 3.56–3.58 2.95–2.96 sm two chromosomes
18 1.02–1.08 2.38–2.44 3.44–3.46 2.21–2.39 sm
19 0.98–1.03 2.40–2.46 3.43–3.44 2.32–2.50 sm
20 0.73–1.00 1.68–1.90 2.41–2.91 1.89–2.31 sm* two chromosomes
total 20m + 20sm four chromosomes two chromosomes

Submetacentric,

††Metacentric,

*Satellite. +: rDNA signal is present, −: absent.

Table 1 FISH karyotype data of Perilla citriodora showing its per chromosome length, arm ratio, type, and rDNAs signals.

Submetacentric,

Metacentric,

Satellite. +: rDNA signal is present, −: absent.

Table 2 FISH karyotype data of Perilla frutescens showing its per chromosome length, arm ratio, type, and rDNAs signals.

Submetacentric,

Metacentric,

Satellite. +: rDNA signal is present, −: absent.