Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

Table. 2.

Table. 2. Table 2

Yield-related traits, mid-parent heterosis (MPH), and best-parent heterosis (BPH) of reciprocal hybrids of Micro-Tom mutants and M82 from two consecutive years.

Trait^z)	2018 (1st year)				2019 (2nd year)
Trait^z)	Genotype	Mean ± SD (n)^y)	MPH	BPH	Genotype	Mean ± SD (n)^y)	MPH	BPH
Plant weight	fh1 × M82	0.95 ± 0.86^a^b (4)	11%	‒55%	fh13 × M82	0.54 ± 0.31^c (8)	‒19%	‒59%
	M82 × fh1	1.03 ± 0.63^a^b (4)	‒4%	‒52%	M82 × fh13	0.56 ± 0.24^c (12)	‒17%	‒58%
	fh8 × M82	0.55 ± 0.25^b (5)	‒48%	‒74%	lp18 × M82	1.25 ± 0.17^a^b (3)	86%	‒5%
	M82 × fh8	0.46 ± 0.20^b (8)	‒57%	‒78%	M82 × lp18	0.62 ± 0.40^b^c (4)	‒8%	‒53%
	lp27 × M82	1.35 ± 0.75^a (5)	27%	‒36%	-	-	-	-
	M82 × lp27	1.38 ± 0.63^a (7)	29%	‒35%	-	-	-	-
Total yield	fh1 × M82	5.72 ± 3.27^a^b (4)	96%	0%	fh13 × M82	3.41 ± 1.51^b (8)	50%	‒22%
	M82 × fh1	3.20 ± 1.26^b (4)	10%	‒44%	M82 × fh13	3.62 ± 1.38^b (12)	60%	‒18%
	fh8 × M82	2.56 ± 0.72^b (5)	‒12%	‒55%	lp18 × M82	7.51 ± 1.22^a (3)	231%	71%
	M82 × fh8	3.58 ± 1.10^b (5)	23%	‒38%	M82 × lp18	5.24 ± 0.74^a^b (4)	131%	19%
	lp27 × M82	7.30 ± 3.66^a (5)	151%	27%	-	-	-	-
	M82 × lp27	7.01 ± 2.63^a (7)	141%	22%	-	-	-	-
Fruit number	fh1 × M82	255.75 ± 177.28^a^b (4)	179%	34%	fh13 × M82	190.13 ± 54.60^b (8)	150%	60%
	M82 × fh1	270.50 ± 195.15^a^b (4)	195%	39%	M82 × fh13	194.42 ± 67.79^b (12)	156%	64%
	fh8 × M82	123.20 ± 42.04^a^b (5)	34%	‒12%	lp18 × M82	343.00 ± 95.45^a (3)	351%	189%
	M82 × fh8	188.00 ± 82.99^a^b (5)	105%	10%	M82 × lp18	291.50 ± 42.35^a (12)	283%	145%
	lp27 × M82	389.00 ± 296.82^a (5)	324%	79%	-	-	-	-
	M82 × lp27	371.00 ± 86.65^a (7)	305%	73%	-	-	-	-
10 fruit weight	fh1 × M82	178.88 ± 38.77^a (4)	10%	‒39%	fh13 × M82	176.78 ± 47.54^b (8)	‒15%	‒52%
	M82 × fh1	202.64 ± 56.55^a (4)	25%	‒31%	M82 × fh13	186.44 ± 35.61^b (12)	‒11%	‒50%
	fh8 × M82	162.18 ± 25.36^a (5)	0%	‒45%	lp18 × M82	231.77 ± 74.45^b (3)	11%	‒37%
	M82 × fh8	147.61 ± 28.71^a (5)	‒9%	‒50%	M82 × lp18	181.22 ± 28.29^b (12)	‒13%	‒51%
	lp27 × M82	171.64 ± 28.68^a (5)	6%	‒41%	-	-	-	-
	M82 × lp27	184.44 ± 32.04^a (7)	14%	‒37%	-	-	-	-
Brix	fh1 × M82	4.58 ± 0.29^a (4)	‒21%	‒28%	fh13 × M82	4.51 ± 0.77^a (12)	‒4%	‒9%
	M82 × fh1	4.08 ± 0.45^a (4)	‒29%	‒36%	M82 × fh13	4.19 ± 0.38^a (12)	‒11%	‒16%
	fh8 × M82	4.78 ± 0.45^a (5)	‒17%	‒25%	lp18 × M82	4.10 ± 0.70^a (3)	‒13%	‒18%
	M82 × fh8	4.74 ± 0.40^a (5)	‒18%	‒26%	M82 × lp18	4.20 ± 0.44^a (12)	‒11%	‒16%
	lp27 × M82	4.80 ± 0.73^a (5)	‒17%	‒25%	-	-	-	-
	M82 × lp27	4.27 ± 0.32^a (7)	‒26%	‒33%	-	-	-	-

Mean value (± s.d.m.) comparison was executed using Tukey’s HSD test, and statistically similar variables are grouped as indicated by the same letter (P < 0.05); n, number of replicates.

^z)Yield and yield related major traits measured.

^y)Values are represented by mean value of the group ± standard deviation represented by “SE” and number of samples in parenthesis represented by “n”. Means were compared using Tukey’s HSD test, and statistically similar variables are grouped by the same letter (P < 0.05).

Plant Breed. Biotech. 2022;10:37-48 https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2022.10.1.37