search for


Screening of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) Germplasm for Resistance to Black Rot
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 2018;6:30-43
Published online March 1, 2018
© 2018 Korean Society of Breeding Science.

Khandker Shazia Afrin1, Md Abdur Rahim1,2, Jong-In Park1, Sathishkumar Natarajan1, Mehede Hassan Rubel1, Hoy-Taek Kim1, and Ill-Sup Nou1,*

1Department of Horticulture, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea, 2Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh
Correspondence to: *Corresponding author: Ill-Sup Nou,, Tel: +82-61-750-3249, Fax: +82-61-750-3208
Received January 20, 2018; Revised January 31, 2018; Accepted January 31, 2018.
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Black rot of Brassica crops is the most devastating disease which causes substantial yield reduction of cabbage throughout the world. The use of resistant cabbage cultivars could be inexpensive and effective measure to combat this destructive disease. We screened cabbage inbred lines for black rot disease resistance through bioassay and identified some novel lines that showed race-specific resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) races. The pathogenicity test revealed that out of 27 cabbage lines, one (SCNU-C-4074), six (SCNU-C-3631, SCNU-C-3637, SCNU-C-3639, SCNU-C-4072, SCNU-C-4073 and SCNU-C-3273), two (SCNU-C-3273 and SCNU-C-4118), two (SCNU-C-3270 and SCNU-C-4118), two (SCNU-C-3470 and SCNU-C-41148) and four (SCNU-C-107, SCNU-C-3270, SCNU-C-3470 and SCNU-C-4059) were shown to be resistant to Xcc races 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, respectively while none of these showed resistance against race 4. Furthermore, these resistant and susceptible lines were evaluated by previously reported molecular markers for black rot resistance. The molecular screening results were also revealed the existence of race-specific resistance in these cabbage lines. This result will help Brassica breeder to develop race-specific black rot resistant cabbage cultivars.

Keywords : Black rot resistance, Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, Cabbage, Bioassay, Molecular markers

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) is the most important vegetable among Brassica crops in the world due to its nutritional and health benefits (Lee et al. 2015). Black rot disease, caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) (Pammel) Dowson, is the most destructive diseases of the crops belonging to the Brassicaceae family (Williams 1980; Lema et al. 2012; Vicente and Holub 2013; Lee et al. 2015). The major host of Xcc is B. oleracea and its subspecies (Vicente et al. 2001). Xcc is mainly a seed born pathogen, but can alive in crop residues and cruciferous weeds and ornamentals (Cook et al. 1952; Roberts et al. 1999; Vicente et al. 2001; Lema et al. 2011). This pathogen can enter into the leaf via insects, wounded tissues and hydathodes (leaf margin) and spreads through vascular tissues (Tonu et al. 2013). Xcc can spread via rain, wind, insects, agricultural equipments and irrigation water (Sharma et al. 2017). The characteristic disease symptoms are V-shaped chlorotic lesions at the leaf margins, necrotic and darkened veins which reduce the quality and production (Williams 1980; Kifuji et al. 2013; Tonu et al. 2013; Vicente and Holub 2013; Lee et al. 2015). In favorable condition, black rot disease can reduce crop yield more than 50% (Williams 1980). However, up to 100% yield loss has been reported in cabbage by farmers in Tanzania (Massomo et al. 2003). Black rot also decreases the market value of cabbage. Like other plant pathogenic bacteria, Xcc has been separated into different physiological races based on the response of differential cultivars with resistance genes and pathogens. Up to now, 11 physiological races of Xcc have been reported (Kamoun et al. 1992; Vicente et al. 2001; Fargier and Manceau 2007; Cruz et al. 2017). Initially, Kamoun et al. (1992) reported five Xcc races (0–4). Later, Vicente et al. (2001) reclassified Xcc into six races (1–6). Furthermore, Jensen et al. (2010) and Fargier and Manceau (2007) were added race 7 and races 8–9 to Vicente’s classification, respectively. Newly, race 10 and race 11 have reported in Portugal (Cruz et al. 2017).

The sources of resistance for black rot in B. oleracea are very less (Ignatov et al. 1998). However, the existence of black rot resistance was reported in Japanese cabbage (Early Fuji, P143660) as well as in Penca kales (Bain 1952; Dickson and Hunter 1987; Ferreira et al. 1992; Ignatov et al. 1999). Ignatov et al. (1998) reported race-specific resistance to Xcc races 1 and 5 in Japanese cabbage lines and Penca kale landraces. The race-specific resistance to Xcc in Asian cabbages was said to be inherited from Penca kales (a Portuguese black rot resistant kale landrace) (Ignatov et al. 1998). There were many research reports describing Xcc resistant genes in B. oleracea and related species. Williams et al. (1972) have been stated that black rot is controlled by one major gene designated as f and the heterozygous condition is influenced by one dominant and one modifier gene. They screened 300 cultivars and inbred lines of cabbage for Xcc resistance and this f gene found only in Early Fuji, a Japanese black rot resistant cabbage cultivar. Dickson and Hunter (1987) reported that black rot resistance is governed by a single recessive gene in cabbage (PI436606, a cabbage line from China). There are some reported quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and associated markers for black rot resistance in different Brassica species. For instance, Camargo et al. (1995) described QTLs for black rot resistance based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) loci in cabbage. They found that two QTLs on linkage group (LG) 1 and 9 showed resistance against black rot for both young and old plants while two additional QTLs on LG 2 only for young plant resistance. Kifuji et al. (2013) reported a QTL for black rot resistance using 161 EST-SNP markers and found that QTL-1 located on LG C02 is the major QTL in cabbage. A major black rot resistance locus called Xca1bo has been mapped on Chromosome 03 in Indian cauliflower (Saha et al. 2014). Lee et al. (2015) reported a genetic linkage map where they identified four QTLs such as BRQTL-C1_1 and BRQTL-C1_2 on LG C01, BRQTL-C3 on LG C03 and BRQTL-C6 on LG 06. Among these QTLs, BRQTL-C1_2 designates as the most important QTL for black rot in cabbage while remaining three as minor QTLs. Sharma et al. (2016) reported black rot resistance locus Xca1bc on LG B-7 in Indian mustard (Brassica carinata). They also reported that black rot resistance in B. carinata was controlled by a single dominant gene. Now-a-days, molecular marker based genotyping are extensively used to screen disease resistance. However, the resistance sources in B. oleracea (C genome) are limited while major resistance sources have been described in A and B genomes (Taylor et al. 2002; Sharma et al. 2016).

Xcc can be retained in seeds, Brassica crop residues, and cruciferous weed and ornamentals which act as the sources of inoculum (Schaad and Dianese 1981). Thus, it is very difficult to control black rot disease through disease management practices including agrochemicals. For this reason, exploration of Xcc resistant sources is one of the best ways to abate crop loss from black rot disease. However, new pathogenic races can be evolved due to the intensive cultivation of resistant cultivars that is the main hinder of black rot resistance (Song et al. 2014). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to screen out novel cabbage lines which provide race-specific resistance against Xcc races.


Plant materials

Twenty seven different cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) inbred lines were tested in this study (Supplementary Table S1). Seeds were obtained from Department of Horticulture, Sunchon National University, Republic of Korea. Initially, seeds were sown in trays containing a nursery pot mixture at plant culture room (25±1°C temperature, 60% Relative humidity and 80–120 μmol/m2/second light intensity). Twenty two days after sowing, the seedlings were transferred into the pot and kept at the glasshouse. For pathogenicity test, seedlings from each of the above mentioned inbred lines were used for screening against black rot disease.

Bacterial strains

A total of seven Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) races (race 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) were inoculated in the aforementioned cabbage line for pathogenicity test which are shown in Table 1. The Xcc races (race 1–7) were collected from the School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, UK. All the Xcc races were grown on King’s medium B (KB) for 48 hours at 30°C (King et al. 1954).

Inoculation and disease scoring

The cabbage inbred lines were inoculated at 35 days after sowing. The Xcc races were sub-cultured on KB at 30°C for 48 hours before inoculation. Thereafter, the bacteria were scraped from the culture plates and suspended in 10 mL of sterile water. Finally, three youngest leaves of each plants were inoculated by clipping secondary veins with sterile forceps (maintained at least 10 inoculation points per leaf) followed by dipping into a bacterial suspension (108–109 CFU/mL) of Xcc races and maintained high humidity (Vicente et al. 2001). Three seedlings for each Xcc race were used for the inoculation. The disease symptoms of inoculated leaves were evaluated at 2 and 3 weeks after inoculation (WAI). The disease reaction was scored at 2 WAI for each inoculated leaf based on a 0–9 scale (Fig. 1) where 0 = no visible symptoms; 1 = small necrosis or chlorosis near the inoculation point; 3 = typical small V-shaped lesion with black veins; 5 = typical lesion half way to the middle vein; 7 = typical lesion succeeding to the middle vein; and 9 = lesion reaching the middle vein as previously described by Vicente et al. (2002). The highly resistant (HR), resistant (R), susceptible (S) and highly susceptible (HS) lines were characterized based one the scales 0, 2–3, 5–7, and 9, respectively (Fig. 1).

DNA extraction

The young leaves of each cabbage lines were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Then, the leaf samples were maintained at −80°C until use. The genomic DNA was isolated using a commercial kit (DNeasy Plant Mini Kit, QIAGEN, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The integrity and purity of the DNA were assessed by gel electrophoresis (0.8% agarose) and Nanodrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA), respectively.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Previously reported markers were used to screen the cabbage inbred lines for black rot resistance (Table 2). The PCR amplification was performed in 20 μL reaction mixture, containing of 2× Prime Taq premix (Genet Bio, Republic of Korea), 10 pmoles of each forward and reverse primers (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) and 100 ng genomic DNA as template. The thermal cycle was set with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 30–35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at specific Tm to respective primer sets (Table 2) between 52 and 61°C for 30 seconds, extension at 72°C for 30 seconds and a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. Then, the PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis to visualize the bands. The concentration of agarose gel was varied based on amplicon size. Finally, results were compared with the bioassay results.

Cloning and sequencing

The polymorphic markers for black rot disease (BoGMS0971, BnGMS301, BoESSR291, BoESSR726 and OI10G06) were amplified by PCR using Phusion® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) from resistant (R) and susceptible (S) cabbage lines. The polymorphic bands were extracted from the gel and purified using the Wizard SV gel and PCR cleanup system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) from both resistant and susceptible lines for each of the above mentioned markers. Then, cloning was done using TOP cloner blunt kit (Enzynomics, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Three independent PCR positive clones were sequenced with the universal primers (M13FpUC and M13RpUC) by ABI 3730XL DNA sequencer (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea). Subsequently, the cloned sequences of R and S lines for each marker were aligned using the Clustal Omega online Multiple Sequence Alignment tool available at


Screening of cabbage inbred lines for the black rot resistance

The disease reaction results of 27 cabbage inbred lines for black rot disease resistance are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 2. The tested cabbage lines provide race-specific resistance against different Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) races. The result showed that cabbage line SCNU-C-4074 was resistant (Fig. 2) against Xcc race 1. A total of six cabbage lines were highly resistant to Xcc race 2 (SCNU-C-3273, SCNU-C-3631, SCNU-C-3637, SCNU-C-3639, SCNU-C-4072 and SCNU-C-4073). Similarly, two lines SCNU-C-3273 and SCNU-C-4118 were resistant to Xcc race 3. Likewise, lines SCNU-C-3270 (highly resistant) and SCNU-C-4118 (resistant) were resistant to Xcc race 5. Two cabbage lines (SCNU-C-3470 and SCNU-C-41148) were shown to be resistant against Xcc race 6. A total of four cabbage lines (SCNU-C-107, SCNU-C-3270, SCNU-C-3470 and SCNU-C-4059) were resistant to Xcc race 7 of which three lines (SCNU-C-3270, SCNU-C-3470 and SCNU-C-4059) were highly resistant. On the other hand, all of the tested lines were susceptible for Xcc race 4. However, some cabbage lines were resistant to more than one Xcc races. For example, line SCNU-C-3270 shown to be resistant against race 5 and 7 (highly resistant), line SCNU-C-3273 against race 2 (highly resistant) and 3, and SCNU-C-4118 against race 3, 5 and 6.

Molecular screening cabbage inbred lines for the black rot resistance

A total of 10 previously published markers (9 SSR and 1 InDel) for black rot resistance were selected for this study based on reported QTL information. Among those reported markers, only five showed polymorphic amplification and were able to distinguish resistant (R) and susceptible (S) cabbage lines against black rot disease (Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. S1). Thereafter, the bioassay and molecular screening results were compared and those having more than 60% adaptability for each race were shown in Table 3. The outcome of the comparison showed that the OI10G06 marker separates R and S lines with 83.3% adaptability, respectively for Xcc race 1 followed by BnGMS301 (79.2%), BoESSR726 (79.2%) and BoESSR291 (66.7%). Similarly, BoESSR291 and OI10G06 can differentiate R and S lines against Xcc race 2 with 73.9% adaptability followed by BoESSR726 (65.2%) and BoGMS0971 (60.9%). In case of race 3, BnGMS301 can differentiate R and S lines with 81.5% adaptability followed by BoESSR291 (77.8%), BoESSR726 (74.1%) and OI10G06 (70.1%). For race 4, BnGMS301 showed 79.2% match with the bioassay results followed by BoESSR726 (75%), OI10G06 (70.8%) and BoESSR291 (66.7%). In case of race 5, BnGMS301 showed 91.3% match with the phenotypic screening results followed by BoESSR726 (78.3%), BoESSR291 (73.9%) and OI10G06 (69.6%). For race 6, BnGMS301 and BoESSR726 can separated R and S cabbage lines with 81.5% adaptability with the bioassay results followed by BoESSR291 (70.4%) and OI10G06 (66.7%). In case of race 7, BnGMS301, BoESSR291, OI10G06 and BoESSR726 showed 72.0%, 68.0%, 68.0% and 64.0% match with the bioassay results, respectively.

Sequence analysis of amplified DNA fragments using markers

The amplified polymorphic markers were further cloned and sequenced from R and S lines. Through sequencing, the genetic variations including insertion/deletions (InDels), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between R and S lines for the polymorphic markers were detected (Supplementary Fig. S2). The BoGMS0971 marker amplified a 351-bp DNA fragment for R lines and 330-bp for S lines. The sequence alignment results showed that there was a total 21-bp deletions from S lines compared to R lines. This marker located on the intergenic region between two genes (Bo8g092870 and Bo8g092880) (Table 4). The BnGMS301 amplified 238-bp DNA fragment for S lines but 215-bp with total 27-bp deletion for R lines, which are located between two genes (Bo1g053300 and Bo1g053310). In case of the BoESSR291, the tested cabbage lines showed three different types of PCR bands. These bands were 114-bp DNA fragment for R lines and another two with InDels, where 21-bp deletions and 16-bp insertions from R line resulted in being susceptible to black rot disease. However, BoESSR291 showed high identity with a genomic fragment where putative promoter sequence of a gene encoding enzyme cystathionine gamma-synthase (Bo3g055310) was located. The BoESSR726 marker amplified a 238-bp DNA fragment for the R line while 228-bp for S line. There were 12-bp InDels for R line and 2-bp InDel for S line which are located in the intergenic region between genes with accession number Bo1g054960 and Bo1g054970. The OI10G06 marker amplified 127-bp DNA fragment for S lines and one with 18-bp deletions for R lines (109-bp), which are located in the intergenic region of two genes (Bo6g095520 and Bo6g095530) (Table 4).


Black rot is considered as one of the main threats of cabbage production in the world and it is very difficult to control. The race-specific resistance in Brassica crops is linked to the hypersensitive response at inoculated area with incompatible race, nonetheless occasionally partial symptom appeared (Kamoun et al. 1992; Ignatov et al. 1997). However, recent reports described Xcc race 1, 4 and 6 as the major races while remaining as the minor races in B. oleracea (Ignatov et al. 1998; Vicente et al. 2001; Taylor et al. 2002; Chidamba and Bezuidenhout 2012; Lema et al. 2012; Rouhrazi and Khodakaramian 2014). In B. oleracea, Taylor et al. (2002) reported that 43% of the tested accessions were resistant to one or more of the minor Xcc races (2, 3, 5, and 6) and only one showed partial resistance to Xcc races 1, 3, 5, and 6. They also noted that resistance is more common to Xcc race 3 and 5 whereas very rare to race 1 in B. oleracea. Moreover, Xcc race 6 was predominant in B. rapa (Lema et al. 2015). But recently Cruz et al. (2017) reported the existence of races 4, 6 and 7 (encompassing 21 out of 33 isolates) in Portugal. In this study, we identified novel cabbage lines with race-specific hypersensitive response against different races of Xcc. The disease reaction results revealed that there were 1, 6, 2, 2, 2 and 4 cabbage inbred lines exhibiting resistance against Xcc race 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, respectively while none of tested lines were resistant to race 4 (Fig. 2 and Table 3). This result is consistent with previous report as described the race-specific resistance against Xcc in Brassica species by Ignatov et al. (1998). Besides, Tonu et al. (2013) also reported black rot resistance in B. oleracea in particular to Xcc race 3 and race 5. It should be noted that the phenotypic screening results revealed SCNU-C-4059 as resistant lines against race 7 but none of the tested markers correlated with the phenotype except BoGMS0971 which showed only 36% adaptability with bioassay results (Table 3).

The genetic inheritance of major black rot resistance genes has been elucidated in different Brassica species including B. rapa, B. carinata and B. napus containing A, BC and AC genome, respectively (Guo et al. 1991; Ignatov et al. 2000; Vicente et al. 2002). However, the strong resistance source for Xcc race 4 was reported to be originated from A genome while resistance to both races 1 and 4 from B genome, and B. juncea (AB genome) was the most resistant species to races 1 and 4 (Taylor et al. 2002). To date, several QTLs for black rot resistance have been described in B. oleracea and other B. species (Camargo et al. 1995; Cheng et al. 2009; Kifuji et al. 2013; Izzah et al. 2014; Saha et al. 2014; Lee et al. 2015; Sharma et al. 2016). In this study, five reported SSR markers showed polymorphism in banding pattern for R and S lines of the tested cabbage lines. By using these markers, we were able to separate R and S lines which were consistent with bioassay based phenotypic screening results (Table 3 and Fig. 2), nevertheless, none of them perfectly match with phenotypic data. These published markers were located on four different chromosomes such as BnGMS301 and BoESSR726 on chromosome C01, BoESSR291 on chromosome C03, OI10G06 on chromosome C06, and BoGMS0971 on chromosome C08 (Fig. 3). Previous reports described several QTLs for black rot resistance on those chromosomes. For instance, Lee et al. (2015) described four QTLs on three different chromosomes where BRQTL-C1_2 on chromosome C01 was the main QTL for black rot resistance in cabbage. Interestingly, the tested polymorphic marker BnGMS301 located on chromosome C01. Tonu et al. (2013) found XccBo(Reiho)2 on chromosome C08 as the major locus for black rot resistance in cabbage and the SSR marker BoGMS0971 was closely linked to it. The remaining two SSR markers namely BoESSR291 and OI10G06 were linked to the minor QTLs (BRQTL-C3 and BRQTL-C6, respectively) (Lee et al. 2015). Plant disease resistance governed by an interaction between specific disease resistance gene (R) of the host plant and avirulence gene (avr) the pathogen and also known as “gene-for-gene” model for plant disease resistance (Flor 1971; Dangl and Jones 2001). The R genes codes for only five classes of proteins and those encoded “nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich-repeat” (NBS-LRR) proteins are the major R genes in “gene-for-gene” plant resistance (Van der Biezen and Jones 1998; Dangl and Jones 2001). The NBS-LRR type R genes were further subdivided into two classes based on N-terminal structures such as those having the intracellular signaling domains of the Drosophila Toll and mammalian interleukin (IL)-1 receptors (TIR-NB-LRR), and others having coiled-coil domains (CC-NB-LRR) (Dangl and Jones 2001). None of the tested markers were located in neither the R genes nor any other annotated genes (Table 5). Therefore, it is crucial to identify R genes responsible for race-specific resistance in cabbage. Taking this into consideration, we performed crossing between R and S cabbage lines for each Xcc race (race 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7) to develop mapping population. Thereafter, with molecular mapping, the specific R genes responsible for race-specific resistance could be elucidated.


This paper was supported by the Sunchon National University Research Fund in 2017. We thank Dr Joana G. Vicente, School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, UK for providing Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races.

Supplementary Information
Fig. 1. The disease reaction scoring criteria used in this study for black rot of cabbage. Scales: 0 = no visible symptoms; 1 = small necrosis or chlorosis near the inoculation point; 3 = typical small V-shaped lesion with black veins; 5 = typical lesion half way to the middle vein; 7 = typical lesion succeeding to the middle vein; and 9 = lesion reaching the middle vein (). 0, high resistant (HR); 1–3, resistant (R); 5–7, susceptible (S); 9, highly susceptible (HS).
Fig. 2. The resistant and susceptible cabbage lines against different races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) at 2 weeks after inoculation. The letters a, b, c, d, e, f and g, represents Xcc race 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, respectively.
Fig. 3. Chromosomes location of five reported polymorphic markers on Brassica oleracea.

Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) races used for bioassay-based screening of cabbage lines.

Sl. No.Bacterial race/strainsSourceReference
1Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Race 1 (B100)UKVicente et al. 2001
2Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Race 2 (3849A)US
3Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Race 3 (5212)UK
4Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Race 4 (CFBP 5817)UK
5Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Race 5 (3880)Australia
6Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Race 6 (6181)Portugal
7Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Race 7 (8450A)UK

List of markers with their primer sequence used in the molecular screening for black rot resistance in cabbage.

Sl. No.MarkersChromosomePrimer sequence (5′……3′)Tm (°C)Size (bp)Marker typeReference
52114SSRIzzah et al. 2014
52317SSRIzzah et al. 2014
55259SSRIzzah et al. 2014
55240SSRIzzah et al. 2014
55228SSRIzzah et al. 2014
52182SSRSaha et al. 2014
55250SSRCheng et al. 2009
52344SSRLi et al. 2011
52109SSRLi et al. 2011
51477InDelLee et al. 2015

Comparison of bioassay and molecular screening results for black rot resistance in cabbage.

Sl. No.LinesRace 1OI10G06BnGMS301BoESSR726BoESSR291Race 2BoESSR291OI10G06BoESSR726BoGMS0971

Not matched4.
% Adaptability83.379.279.266.773.973.965.260.9
Sl. No.LinesRace 3BnGMS301BoESSR291BoESSR726OI10G06Race 4BnGMS301BoESSR726OI10G06BoESSR291

Not matched5.
% Adaptability81.577.874.
Sl. No.LinesRace 5BnGMS301BoESSR726BoESSR291OI10G06Race 6BnGMS301BoESSR726BoESSR291OI10G06

Not matched2.
% Adaptability91.378.373.969.681.581.570.466.7
Sl. No.LinesRace 7BnGMS301BoESSR291OI10G06BoESSR726

Not matched7.
% Adaptability72.

z)P, phenotype based on disease reaction;

y)G, genotype on molecular marker screening;

x)HR, high resistant;

w)R, resistant;

v)S, susceptible;

u)HS, high susceptible;

t)n/a, bioassay data not available.

The tested molecular markers and their location on Brassica oleracea genome.

Maker nameLocationz)Description
BoGMS0971C8:31754531..31754753Intergenic region (Bo8g092870 and Bo8g092880)
BnGMS301C1:15386406..15386643Intergenic region (Bo1g053300 and Bo1g053310)
BoESSR291C3:21846613..21846644Promoter region of a gene cystathionine gamma-synthase (Bo3g055310)
BoESSR726C1:15967972..15968174Intergenic region (Bo1g054960 and Bo1g054970)
OI10G06C6:29898028..29898121Intergenic region (Bo6g095520 and Bo6g095530)

z)The chromosomal locations are shown according to the ENSEMBL-based Brassica oleracea genome database.

Genes around the tested polymorphic molecular markers in Brassica oleracea genome.

MakersGene IDDescription

BoGMS0971Bo8g092870V-type proton ATPase subunit D-likeVacuolar ATP synthase subunit DV-type proton ATPase subunit D-like
Bo8g092880Citrate synthase 2, peroxisomal-likeCitrate synthase 1Citrate synthase-like, large alpha subdomain
BnGMS301Bo1g053300(E)-beta-ocimene synthase, chloroplasticTerpene synthase 02Terpene synthase-like
Bo1g053310(E)-beta-ocimene synthase, chloroplasticTerpene synthase 02Uncharacterized protein
BoESSR291Bo3g055310Cystathionine gamma-synthaseCystathionine gamma-synthaseCystathionine gamma-synthase (CGS)
BoESSR726Bo1g054960UncharacterizedABC transporter family proteinABC transporter D family member 2, chloroplastic
Bo1g054970UncharacterizedMitochondrial transcription termination factor family proteinMitochodrial transcription termination factor-related
OI10G06Bo6g095520UncharacterizedUnknown proteinPutative uncharacterized protein
Bo6g095530Protein argonaute 7-likeArgonaute family proteinProtein argonaute

z)The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI);

y)The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR);

x)The Brassica oleracea Genome Database (Bolbase).

  1. Bain, D (1952). Reaction of brassica seedlings to blackrot. Phytopathology. 42, 316-319.
  2. Camargo, L, Williams, P, and Osborn, T (1995). Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling resistance of Brassica oleracea to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in the field and greenhouse. Phytopathology. 85, 1296-1300.
  3. Cheng, X, Xu, J, Xia, S, Gu, J, Yang, Y, and Fu, J (2009). Development and genetic mapping of microsatellite markers from genome survey sequences in Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet. 118, 1121-113.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Chidamba, L, and Bezuidenhout, CC (2012). Characterisation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris isolates from South Africa using genomic DNA fingerprinting and pathogenicity tests. Eur J Plant Pathol. 133, 811-818.
  5. Cook, A, Walker, J, and Larson, R (1952). Studies on the disease cycle of black rot of crucifers. Phytopathology. 42, 162-167.
  6. Cruz, J, Tenreiro, R, and Cruz, L (2017). Assessment of diversity of Xanthomonas campestris pathovars affecting cruciferous plants in portugal and disclosure of two novel X. campestris pv. campestris races. J Plant Pathol. 99, 403-414.
  7. Dangl, JL, and Jones, JD (2001). Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 411, 826-833.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Dickson, M, and Hunter, J (1987). Inheritance of resistance in cabbage seedlings to black rot. HortScience. 22, 108-109.
  9. Fargier, E, and Manceau, C (2007). Pathogenicity assays restrict the species Xanthomonas campestris into three pathovars and reveal nine races within X. campestris pvcampestris. Plant Pathol. 56, 805-818.
  10. Ferreira, M, Dias, J, Mengistu, A, and Williams, P (1992). Screening of Portuguese cole landraces (Brassica oleracea L.) with Leptosphaeria maculans and Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Euphytica. 65, 219-227.
  11. Flor, HH (1971). Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 9, 275-296.
  12. Guo, H, Dickson, M, and Hunter, J (1991). Brassica napus sources of resistance to black rot in crucifers and inheritance of resistance. HortScience. 26, 1545-1547.
  13. Ignatov, A, Kuginuki, Y, and Hidam, K (2000). Distribution and inheritance of race-specific resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica rapa and B napus. J Russ Phytopathol Soc. 1, 89-94.
  14. Ignatov, A, Hida, K, and Kuginuki, Y (1999). Pathotypes of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Japan. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung. 34, 177-182.
  15. Ignatov, A, Vicente, J, Conway, J, Roberts, S, and Taylor, J 1997. Identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races and sources of resistance. ISHS Symposium on Brassicas, 10th Crucifer Genetics Workshop, pp.23-27.
  16. Ignatov, A, Kuginuki, Y, and Hida, K (1998). Race-specific reaction of resistance to black rot in Brassica oleracea. Eur J Plant Pathol. 104, 821-827.
  17. Izzah, NK, Lee, J, Jayakodi, M, Perumal, S, Jin, M, and Park, B (2014). Transcriptome sequencing of two parental lines of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.) and construction of an EST-based genetic map. BMC Genomics. 15, 149.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Jensen, BD, Vicente, JG, Manandhar, HK, and Roberts, SJ (2010). Occurrence and diversity of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in vegetable Brassica fields in Nepal. Plant Dis. 94, 298-305.
  19. Kamoun, S, Kamdar, HV, Tola, E, and Kado, CI (1992). Incompatible interactions between crucifers and Xanthomonas compestris involve a vascular hypersensitive response: role of the hrpK locus. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 5, 22-33.
  20. Kifuji, Y, Hanzawa, H, Terasawa, Y, and Nishio, T (2013). QTL analysis of black rot resistance in cabbage using newly developed EST-SNP markers. Euphytica. 190, 289-295.
  21. King, EO, Ward, MK, and Raney, DE (1954). Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med. 44, 301-307.
  22. Lee, J, Izzah, NK, Jayakodi, M, Perumal, S, Joh, HJ, and Lee, HJ (2015). Genome-wide SNP identification and QTL mapping for black rot resistance in cabbage. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 32.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Lema, M, Soengas, P, Velasco, P, Francisco, M, and Cartea, M (2011). Identification of sources of resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica napus crops. Plant Dis. 95, 292-297.
  24. Lema, M, Cartea, ME, Francisco, M, Velasco, P, and Soengas, P (2015). Screening for resistance to black rot in a Spanish collection of Brassica rapa. Plant Breeding. 134, 551-556.
  25. Lema, M, Cartea, ME, Sotelo, T, Velasco, P, and Soengas, P (2012). Discrimination of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races among strains from northwestern Spain by Brassica spp. genotypes and rep-PCR. Eur J Plant Pathol. 133, 159-169.
  26. Li, H, Chen, X, Yang, Y, Xu, J, Gu, J, and Fu, J (2011). Development and genetic mapping of microsatellite markers from whole genome shotgun sequences in Brassica oleracea. Mol Breed. 28, 585-596.
  27. Massomo, SM, Nielsen, H, Mabagala, RB, Mansfeld-Giese, K, Hockenhull, J, and Mortensen, CN (2003). Identification and characterisation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris strains from Tanzania by pathogenicity tests, biolog, rep-PCR and fatty acid methyl ester analysis. Eur J Plant Pathol. 109, 775-789.
  28. Roberts, S, Hiltunen, L, Hunter, P, and Brough, J (1999). Transmission from seed to seedling and secondary spread of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica transplants: effects of dose and watering regime. Eur J Plant Pathol. 105, 879-889.
  29. Rouhrazi, K, and Khodakaramian, G (2014). Genetic fingerprinting of Iranian Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris strains inducing black rot disease of crucifers. Eur J Plant Pathol. 139, 175-184.
  30. Saha, P, Kalia, P, Sonah, H, and Sharma, TR (2014). Molecular mapping of black rot resistance locus Xca1bo on chromosome 3 in Indian cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.). Plant Breeding. 133, 268-274.
  31. Schaad, N, and Dianese, J (1981). Cruciferous weeds as sources of inoculum of Xanthomonas campestris in black rot of crucifers. Phytopathology. 71, 1215-1220.
  32. Sharma, BB, Kalia, P, Singh, D, and Sharma, TR (2017). Introgression of black rot resistance from Brassica carinata to cauliflower (Brassica oleracea botrytis Group) through embryo rescue. Front Plant Sci. 8, 1255.
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Sharma, BB, Kalia, P, Yadava, DK, Singh, D, and Sharma, TR (2016). Genetics and molecular mapping of black rot resistance locus Xca1bc on chromosome B-7 in Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun.). PLoS ONE. 11, e0152290.
  34. Song, E, Kim, S, Noh, T, Cho, H, Chae, S, and Lee, B (2014). PCR-based assay for rapid and specific detection of the new Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae K3a race using an AFLP-derived marker. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 24, 732-739.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Taylor, J, Conway, J, Roberts, S, Astley, D, and Vicente, JG (2002). Sources and origin of resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica genomes. Phytopathology. 92, 105-111.
  36. Tonu, NN, Doullah, MA, Shimizu, M, Karim, MM, Kawanabe, T, and Fujimoto, R (2013). Comparison of Positions of QTLs Conferring Resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica oleracea. Am J of Plant Sci. 4, 11-20.
  37. Van der Biezen, EA, and Jones, JD (1998). Plant disease-resistance proteins and the gene-for-gene concept. Trends Biochem Sci. 23, 454-456.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Vicente, JG, and Holub, EB (2013). Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (cause of black rot of crucifers) in the genomic era is still a worldwide threat to Brassica crops. Molecular Plant Pathology. 14, 2-18.
  39. Vicente, JG, Taylor, J, Sharpe, A, Parkin, I, Lydiate, D, and King, G (2002). Inheritance of race-specific resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica genomes. Phytopathology. 92, 1134-1141.
  40. Vicente, JG, Conway, J, Roberts, S, and Taylor, J (2001). Identification and origin of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races and related pathovars. Phytopathology. 91, 492-499.
  41. (1980). Black rot: a continuing threat to world crucifers. Plant Dis. 64, 736-742.
  42. Williams, P, Staub, T, and Sutton, J (1972). Inheritance of resistance in cabbage to black rot. Phytopathology. 62, 247-252.