search for


Expression of Heat Shock Proteins by Heat Stress in Soybean
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 2017;5:344-353
Published online December 1, 2017
© 2017 Korean Society of Breeding Science.

Kitae Song, Won Cheol Yim, and Byung-Moo Lee*

Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 04620, Korea
Correspondence to: Byung-Moo Lee,, Tel: +82-31-961-5130, Fax: +82-31-961-5659
Received November 10, 2017; Revised November 23, 2017; Accepted November 23, 2017.
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Heat stress is one of the factors disturb productivity and growth of plants. Many genes including heat shock protein (HSP), heat shock transcription factors (HSF) and chaperones, were identified and characterized in many plants to play role in increased tolerance to abiotic stress. To reveal responsive gene to heat stress, we performed RNA-seq using two Korean soybean varieties under heat stress and normal conditions. The transcripts were analyzed, and we obtained 2,458 genes including 46 co-up regulation and 55 co-down regulated genes in both soybean varieties. We also revealed HSPs, HSFs and chaperones in the differentially expressed genes using BLAST and Pfam analyzation and verified expression changes under heat stress. Finally, we find 68 genes involved in HSP, HSF, chaperones in heat responsive genes associated increasing heat tolerance. As a result, relatively small HSP families were up regulated and continuously expressed in long period heat stress. On the other hand, large molecule HSPs, HSFs and chaperonin did not response to long heat stress. The expression profiling and characterization provide invaluable information to understand heat tolerance of soybean.

Keywords : Heat stress, RNA sequencing, Transcriptome, Expression pattern, Soybean

Global climate change is becoming a serious condition to plants. Among abiotic stress, heat stress is one of the factors disturb productivity and growth of plants. Plants could not move their position to avoid stresses, stress response system with molecular level is important to growth and productivity in plants. Among many stress response systems, heat shock proteins (HSPs), heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) and chaperone are essential for maintenance and restoration of protein structure and stabilized condition of plants under heat stress (Boston et al. 1996; Nakamoto and Vigh 2006; Xu et al. 2012). Since the HSPs expression observed under heat stress (Lindquist and Craig 1988), the heat stress response pathway has been continually studied in plant (Queitsch et al. 2000; Kotak et al. 2007; Larkindale and Vierling 2007; Yamada et al. 2007). Heat stress has make mis-folded proteins and cause to losing of biological activity in plant. These damaged proteins are interfering to normal cell functioning. Chaperones and HSPs have functions which restoration of mis-folding proteins and minimizing damages for maintenance plant homeostasis (Boston et al. 1996; Bukau et al. 2006; Pratt et al. 2010). Also, these stress response systems are regulated by HSFs which has DNA binding sites (Schöffl et al. 1998; Nover et al. 2001; Hsu et al. 2010).

Plant HSPs are classified into some types according to molecular size (Sarkar et al. 2009), small HSPs, HSP20, HSP60, HSP70, HSP90 and HSP100. These families also have been characterized in a few plants (Krishna and Gloor 2001; Hu et al. 2009; Lopes-Caitar et al. 2013). Some studies had tried to reveal a function of HSPs, HSFs and chaperones from Zea mays, rice, Arabiodopsis and soybean (Queitsch et al. 2000; Rhoads et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2009; Qi et al. 2010; Sun et al. 2012) and expression gene profiles of HSPs and HSFs were identified using microarray analysis and quantitative real time PCR (Hu et al. 2009; Lopes-Caitar et al. 2013).

Since the development of next generation sequencing method, gene and transcript analysis has made possible with quickly and cost effectively. Because of the low cost and high capacity of data, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) has been using to measuring differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to stress (Marioni et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2009; Anders and Huber 2010; Rapaport et al. 2013). It was also used to reveal differential expressed transcriptome in rice under cold conditions (Shen et al. 2014), HD-Zip transcription factors in soybean under salt stress (Belamkar et al. 2014) and regulated genes in Brassica juncea under drought stress and high temperature (Bhardwaj et al. 2015).

Soybean is one of important crop plant in worldwide. In soybean, heat stress significantly decreased plant growth and yield. Recently, mechanism of HSP20 and HSP90 families were studied to understand of heat response system in soybean (Lopes-Caitar et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2013). But there were not enough attempts to reveal the profiling of DEGs involved in HSP families under heat stress in soybean.

In this study, gene expression pattern was analyzed from RNA of soybean leaves under normal and heat stress conditions. The plants were treated for 12 hours under heat stress to focus on verifying referential genes to increase heat tolerance. We used RNA-seq as a tool to obtain differential expression pattern of genes under heat stress. The DEGs were analyzed by Blast to identify their functions, and compared to gene lists of HSPs, HSFs and chaperons were obtained from Blast searches on Phytozome. This study not only provides heat responsive genes but also improves knowledge for HSPs, HSFs and chaperons.


Plant materials and stress conditions

Seeds of soybean accessions Daewon (IT 212859) and Hwangkeum (IT 142807) were obtained from National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, Suwon, Korea. These seeds were planted directly into pots containing Sunshine mix 5 (Sungro Horiticulture, Quicy, MI) and were grown until V5 stage in greenhouse. After V5 stage was reached, the plants were moved to heat stress conditions. The plants were exposed to heat stress (38 ± 2°C) for 12 hours and then leaves were immediately collected in liquid nitrogen gas and transferred to deep freezers (−80°C).

RNA isolation and RNA-seq

For all samples, total RNA was prepared from leaf tissues under each condition using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The RNA quality was checked for integrity before performing the RNA sequencing process using a 2100 Bioanalyzer RNA Nanochip (Agilent Technologies, USA). After a quality check, RNA sequencing using Illumina HiSeq platform was performed by Theragen, Inc. (Korea). Raw sequence reads have been submitted to the NCBI sequence read archive (SRA) database under accession number SRA274425.

RNA-seq data processing and annotation

Raw reads from Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platforms were imported to CLC Genomics Workbench 7.5.1 (CLC Bio) and read statistics were assessed using sequencing data quality control, followed by read trimming for quality. The raw reads were trimmed with a quality score limit of 0.01. The high-quality reads were mapped to the soybean genome sequence of Williams 82 from Phytozome version 10 (Gmax_275_wm82.a2.v1) ( used as the reference sequences in CLC Genomics Workbench. The RNA-seq analysis was carried out gene expression and transcript expression using default parameters.

The gene expression data of either in normal or heat stressed plants was determined using reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM) used as a measure (Mortazavi et al. 2008). The expression values were normalized using scaling method to comparable (Robinson and Oshlack 2010). After normalization of the RPKM values, the expression fold change was calculated based on normalized RPKM log2 transformed expression values between each condition. We used Kal’s method to test the significance of the expression fold change (Kal et al. 1999). To select differentially expressed genes, we set threshold as P-value < 0.05, mapped reads > 5 and fold change > |2|.

Blast2GO (Conesa et al. 2005) was used to annotate each consensus sequence of the assemblies. Each consensus sequence was analyzed using BLAST to nonredundant (nr) database of NCBI using BLASTX with e-value of 1.0E-3 and default parameters. The consensus sequences contained Hidden Markov Model (HMM) domains were searched in Pfam databases (version 27). The results of Blast2GO were applied using the hyper-geometric tool BiNGO as cytoscapes app (Maere et al. 2005).

HSPs, HSFs, chaperones analysis

We got a total number of 392 genes from BLAST results of Phytozome (version 10). The list of BLAST results contained 276 HSP genes, 52 HSF genes and 64 chaperone genes. The 392 genes were compared with expression values from RNA-seq data and selected expressed genes under heat stress. The consensus sequences of selected genes were conducted to phylogenetic analyses using neighbor joining distance algorithm with 1000 bootstrap.

Validation of differentially expressed genes from RNA-Seq using quantitative real time RT-PCR analysis (qRT-PCR)

The extracted RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA synthesis kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) and random primers according to the manufacturer’s procedure. The cDNA was performed on Rotor-gene Q real-time PCR system with SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and transcript specific primers. The cDNAs have been checked expression of heat stress marker (GMHsp90C2.1) which can validate for the plants applied heat stress (Xu et al. 2013). PCR primers were designed with the parameters of 17–25 nucleotide lengths, and 150–200 product size. PCR program was set as 5 minutes at 95°C, 40 cycles each of 20 seconds at 95°C, 30 seconds at 59°C. Melt curve analysis was performed at the end of every PCRs. Threshold cycle for each reaction was normalized with expression value of ActB (B-actin). Relative expression values were calculated by 2−ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). All the experiments were processed with three biological replicates to obtained high credibility of experiments.


Analysis of RNA sequencing data

To compare expression profiles of genes, we obtained two pairs of RNAs from control and heat-treated plant in Daewon and Hwangkeum. Total number of raw reads ranged from 25,678,226 to 27,543,208 in Daewon and Hwangkeum has shown reads range from 51,460,028 to 51,764,174 (Table 1). After trimming and filtering, approximately 98.1 million reads aligned to the reference genome (Gmax_275_wm82.a2.v1). Of the total paired reads, average over of 60% reads were mapped to reference genome. Among mapped reads, 92.2–95.7% reads were located to exons. Some reads were located to introns (1.0–1.3%) and intergenic regions (3.3–6.5%) (Supplementary Table S1). The genes with mapping reads were used for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis.

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis

Totally, the abundance of 40,474 genes and 41,845 genes was shown as a result of RNA-seq under heat stress in Daewon and Hwangkeum, respectively. To obtain heat-regulated genes, we selected differentially expressed genes by comparing normalized RPKM log2 transformed expression values. After the comparing, 1,292 and 1,166 genes were obtained between heat-stressed plant and control plants with thresholds in Daewon and Hwangkeum, respectively (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

A total number of 2,458 genes were shown differential expression pattern. A number of 347 genes were up regulated by heat stress in Daewon and 945 genes in down regulated. The down regulated genes were found 644 genes, while 522 genes were up regulated under heat stress in Hwangkeum. Among them, the 46 genes had been found as co-up regulated genes under heat stress conditions and the 55 genes were shown co-down regulated genes (Fig. 1). A total number of 51 genes were identified inversed regulation between two varieties.

Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyzation

We selected 1,292 genes and 1,166 genes in Daewon and Hwangkeum by DEGs analysis, which include co-up and co-down regulated genes. The DEGs were assigned to functional categories using Blast2GO. The DEGs were classified according plant GO enrichment analysis using Blast results. Whole of DEGs from both cultivars were classified into 11 categories (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S4). As remarkable results, many genes were classified to transcription factor activity (GO:0003700, 91 sequences), transcription regulator activity (GO:0030528, 92 sequences) and sequence-specific DNA binding (GO:0030246, 58 sequences). These GO terms were reported helpful to improve abiotic stress tolerance including HSP and HSF families (Lopes-Caitar et al. 2013).

HSPs, HSFs and chaperones

We obtained gene list of HSPs, HSFs and chaperones from Blast searches in Phytozome. The list contained 276 HSP genes, 52 HSFs and 64 chaperone genes from soybean. Among them, only 68 genes were shown within DEGs (Table 2). The 5 genes had shown as co-up regulated genes, contained 4 HSP genes (HSP20/alpha crystallin family) and 1 AAA domain (Cdc48 sub-family) have reported play a role as like HSP (Supplementary Table S5). By contrast, the only 1 gene was shown in list of co-down regulated gene. The expression patterns of HSP, HSF and chaperonin are different for cultivars. Daewon has shown down-regulation of HSP families and up-regulation of chaperonin under heat condition. But relatively more HSPs are shown up regulation to response heat stress in Hwangkeum. Generally, HSP70 families were down regulated and HSP20 families were up regulated in both cultivar under heat stress (Supplementary Tables S5 and S6). A large part of the co-up regulated genes is HSP20, in comparison, the co-down and down list each variety were consisted of HSP70 and HSP90 (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table S5). Likewise, HSP20 families were shown in list of up-regulated genes from each variety, and large molecular HSP families (HSP70 and HSP90) were shown down-regulation. Almost the HSFs were not found in up regulated genes, but HSFs were found in down regulation list of each variety.

Validation of differentially expressed genes by quantitative real time RT-PCR

To verify reliability of the expression profiles from RNA-seq data, qRT-PCR analysis was performed for DEGs (Fig. 4). We have checked the expression of heat stress marker (GMHsp90C2.1) with three biological replicates. Expression of GMHsp90C2.1 which has been used as heat stress marker was shown up-regulation in both cultivars. As a result, it was confirmed that the plant was treated with heat stress. RNA-seq results showed that almost of the large molecule HSPs were down-regulated, and the same results were obtained with qRT-PCR. Co-down regulation gene (Glyma.18G289100) and four genes (Glyma.08G025700, Glyma.18G074100, Glyma.13G224000 and Glyma. 15G088000), which showed down regulation in each cultivar showed similar pattern in qRT-PCR. The other hand, HSP20 gene family increased in both cultivars under heat stress. In both cultivars, 5 genes (Glyma.04G054400, Glyma. 06G054700, Glyma.07G200200, Glyma.08G242100 and Glyma.18G094600) were expressed as co-up regulation, which could be confirmed by qRT-PCR. The other genes (Glyma.04G229800, Glyma.09G131500 and Glyma. 17G072400) that were up-regulated in each variety were not distinguished by DEGs because of the high cut-off of this experiment, but they showed a sufficiently high expression level. HSF genes also were confirmed by qRTPCR. The HSF genes were shown similar results to expectation from RNA-seq while showed inconsistent expression pattern with distance of phylogenetic tree. Two chaperonin genes (Glyma.15G250500 and Glyma.17G047200) were shown similar expression pattern. Almost chaperonin genes were up regulated in Daewon while the change of expression pattern could not be observed in Hwangkeum. Generally, results of qRT-PCR nearly matched expectation from RNA-seq data. Expression pattern of DEGs which other than HSP genes were also like expected values.


The heat stress has negative effect on the physiology and metabolism of plant cells. In this study, we obtained DEGs on heat treated Korean soybeans involved in heat tolerance to verify response genes in soybean. Also, HSPs, HSFs and chaperone genes which associated with heat stress tolerance were found in DEGs. The DEGs were performed Blast and Pfam analysis for understand heat response system in soybeans.

The primary subject of this study was to observe the differentially expressed genes under heat stress. Totally, 2,458 genes were selected as DEGs in both cultivars (Fig. 1, Supplementary Tables S2 and S3) and the genes were classified according to gene ontology (GO) (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S4). The smaller numbers of genes which has same expression patterns as like co-up (46 genes) and co-down (55 genes) were detected than expectations. These results were due to the following reasons: First, the RNA-seq data were analyzed with highly cut-off to obtain more accurate information. For example, the HSP20 families were up regulated in both cultivars. In the alpha crystallin family, which is part of hsp20, it consists of a total of six genes (Glyma.06G054700, Glyma. 20G015900, Glyma.04G054400, Glyma.14G100000, Glyma.14G099900 and Glyma.17G224900). Due to the high cut-off of the experiment, some genes did not find to be DEGs, but expression patterns are all up-regulation. Second, genetic properties of soybean cultivars. Expansion of the HSP gene family has generally occurred through and whole-genome duplications events. We also found this phenomenon in the phylogenetic tree of DEGs. The combined phylogenetic tree revealed that the orthologous relationships between HSP families are contained in paralogous pairs of each cultivars. In conclusion, although one gene does not show the same expression pattern in both cultivars, gene families with similar roles have similar expression patterns. For example, Glyma.02G244300 and Glyma.14g214800 were up-regulated in only one cultivar. Both genes are expected to play a similar role because of same gene family, but only one gene is expressed due to their genetic characteristics. This phenomenon can be regarded a difference due to genetic diversity as a characteristic of a plant having a variety of substitution genes on one function.

To verify expression pattern of HSPs, HSFs and chaperones, we obtained list from Blast in Phytozome database. We compared the list and DEGs from RNA-seq data, and found out 68 heat responsive genes included 56 HSPs, 7 HSFs and 5 chaperones. Of the total, HSP20 families had a large part in co-up regulated genes. The HSP20 families had known play a role as protect protein denaturation in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells (Feder and Hofmann 1999; Cashikar et al. 2005). We found HSP20 families in co-up regulated genes (Glyma.06G054700, Glyma.04G54400, Glyma.07G200200, Glyma.18G094600 and Glyma.08G242100) which were similar with the previous study (Lopes-Caitar et al. 2013). The other HSP20 families were up regulated in both cultivars, but were not passed cut-off in Daewon. Some of HSP90 genes include GmHsp90A1 (Glyma.09g131500) and GMHsp90C1.2 (Glyma.02g124500) were reported as rapidly accumulate and be maintained for a long period (Xu et al. 2013). These genes were found in up-regulation genes of Hwangkeum, but did not found to be DEGs in Daewon. As above described, this the gene up regulated in Daewon, but did not passed our high cut-off. The other HSP90 and HSP70 families were reported that rapidly accumulated and decreased expression level with time under stress (Swindell et al. 2007). Likewise, the other HSP90 families were shown down regulation in both varieties. Other large molecular HSP families as like HSP70 (Glyma.18G289100, Glyma.11G140500, Glyma.08G025700, Glyma.05G219600, Glyma.08G025900, Glyma.12G064000, Glyma.15G088000 and Glyma.13G224000) and HSP90 (Glyma.18G074100, Glyma.08G332900 and Glyma.17G258700) were down regulated by heat stress. It is seemed to that these genes had responded at short period under heat stress and decreased following time.

The HSF genes also were response to short term heat stress (Li et al. 2014). Some HSF genes were showed highly expression under heat stress until 6 hours and the expression decreased at 12 hours. In our results, very few HSF genes were found. It is suggested that HSFs does not significantly affect long-term stress over 12 hours.

Gene ontology analysis was used to verify domain of co-up regulated genes as like candidate of gene related heat responses. Some genes (Glyma.03G130400, Glyma. 03G130600, Glyma.08G215500, Glyma.12G178500, Glyma.01G198100, Glyma.13G251300 and Glyma. 19G222000) with DNA binding domains (HLH, and Zinc binding) were also found in Pfam analysis. These domains were predicted to play a role as transcription factor as like HSF genes (Downs and Heckathorn 1998; Baniwal et al. 2004). Chytochrome P450 domains found in up regulations in both cultivars. This domain was known that induced by abiotic stress and contained the recognition site of TGA-box, W-box, MTB and MYC for transcription factors (Narusaka et al. 2004). Some of the other domains (FAD binding and NADH (P) binding) were seemed to related in reactive oxygen species (Supplementary Table S6) (Marino et al. 2012; Kikusato and Toyomizu 2013). These domains have a role control expression of genes as like HSFs, and could lead to improve heat stress tolerance of plants.

In conclusion, we performed RNA-seq of two Korean soybeans to understand the gene expression and responsive system under heat stress. The expression patterns and characters were determined using RNA-seq and bioinformatics tools for verify fundamental genes to response to heat stress. Based on the DEGs and Pfam analysis, the genes were inferred which the primary genes to improve heat tolerance under heat stress. Especially, HSP20 and HSP90 families could played an important role and improved tolerance in long period heat stress and maintain their homeostasis. Among the DEGs expected to play an important role, some genes did not express in same pattern in both cultivars. However, we have discovered a phenomenon that expression of similar genes to be maintain the same function. These results suggest that the heat stress tolerance of a plant is related to the expression pattern of the HSP gene families rather than to a specific gene. These results can be further analyzed to reveal gene related heat tolerance and understand responded mechanism to heat stress.


This work was conducted with the support of the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ907047), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Supplementary Information
Fig. 1. Venn diagram showing number of differentially expressed genes among under heat stress condition. A: down regulated genes in Daewon; B: up regulated genes in Daewon; C: up regulated genes in Hwangkeum; D: down regulated genes in Hwangkeum.
Fig. 2. Results of GO enrichment analysis. Significantly enriched GO terms (P < 0.05) are highlighted, and the color saturation means positively correlation with significantly corresponding GO terms.
Fig. 3. Expression and phylogenetic tress of DEGs involved in heat shock proteins. Expression changes of HSP, HSF and chaperonin under heat stress in both cultivars. The color gradient represents statistical significance as the log2 fold changes. Red indicates significant up regulation while blue indicates significantly down regulation under heat stress.
Fig. 4. Validation of heat regulated genes using quantitative real time PCR. Relative expression of genes was compared to ActB gene as control. The means and standard error (error bar) of three independent experiments are shown.

Overview of the RNA-seq reads acquired from Daewon and Hwangkeum in each condition.


ControlHeat stressControlHeat stress
Reads mapped in pairs18,175,35616,631,76831,843,69231,483,384
Reads mapped in broken pairs5,168,0785,234,26010,355,29211,071,414
Reads not mapped4,199,7743,812,1989,261,0449,209,376
Total reads27,543,20825,678,22651,460,02851,764,174

Summary of comparison between Blast results of DEGs and results from Phytozome.

Expression patternsHSPHSFChaperonin
Down in both cultivars100
Up in both cultivars500
Down in Daewon1120
Up in Daewon015
Down in Hwangkeum630
Up in Hwangkeum3310


  1. Anders, S, and Huber, W (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Baniwal, SK, Bharti, K, Chan, KY, Fauth, M, Ganguli, A, and Kotak, S (2004). Heat stress response in plants: a complex game with chaperones and more than twenty heat stress transcription factors. J Biosci. 29, 471-487.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Belamkar, V, Weeks, NT, Bharti, AK, Farmer, AD, Graham, MA, and Cannon, SB (2014). Comprehensive characterization and RNA-Seq profiling of the HD-Zip transcription factor family in soybean (Glycine max) during dehydration and salt stress. BMC Genomics. 15, 950.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Bhardwaj, AR, Joshi, G, Kukreja, B, Malik, V, Arora, P, and Pandey, R (2015). Global insights into high temperature and drought stress regulated genes by RNA-Seq in economically important oilseed crop Brassica juncea. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Boston, RS, Viitanen, PV, and Vierling, E (1996). Molecular chaperones and protein folding in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 32, 191-222.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Bukau, B, Weissman, J, and Horwich, A (2006). Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell. 125, 443-451.
  7. Cashikar, AG, Duennwald, M, and Lindquist, SL (2005). A chaperone pathway in protein disaggregation. J Biol Chem. 280, 23869-23875.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Conesa, A, Götz, S, Garcia-Gomez, JM, Terol, J, Talon, M, and Robles, M (2005). Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 21, 3674-3676.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Downs, CA, and Heckathorn, SA (1998). The mitochondrial small heat-shock protein protects NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase of the electron transport chain during heat stress in plants. FEBS Lett. 430, 246-250.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Feder, ME, and Hofmann, GE (1999). Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 61, 243-282.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Hsu, SF, Lai, HC, and Jinn, TL (2010). Cytosol-localized heat shock factor-binding protein, AtHSBP, functions as a negative regulator of heat shock response by translocation to the nucleus and is required for seed development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 153, 773-784.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Hu, W, Hu, G, and Han, B (2009). Genome-wide survey and expression profiling of heat shock proteins and heat shock factors revealed overlapped and stress specific response under abiotic stresses in rice. Plant Sci. 176, 583-590.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Kal, AJ, van Zonneveld, AJ, Benes, V, van den Berg, M, Koerkamp, MG, and Albermann, K (1999). Dynamics of gene expression revealed by comparison of serial analysis of gene expression transcript profiles from yeast grown on two different carbon sources. Mol Biol Cell. 10, 1859-1872.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Kikusato, M, and Toyomizu, M (2013). Crucial role of membrane potential in heat stress-induced overproduction of reactive oxygen species in avian skeletal muscle mitochondria. PLoS ONE. 8, e64412.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Kotak, S, Larkindale, J, Lee, U, von Koskull-Döring, P, Vierling, E, and Scharf, KD (2007). Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 10, 310-316.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Krishna, P, and Gloor, G (2001). The Hsp90 family of proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell Stress Chaperones. 6, 236-246.
  17. Larkindale, J, and Vierling, E (2007). Core genome responses involved in acclimation to high temperature. Plant Physiol. 146, 748-761.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Li, PS, Yu, TF, He, GH, Chen, M, Zhou, YB, and Chai, SC (2014). Genome-wide analysis of the HSF family in soybean and functional identification of GmHsf-34 involvement in drought and heat stresses. BMC Genomics. 15, 1009.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Lindquist, S, and Craig, EA (1988). The heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 22, 631-677.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Liu, JG, Qin, QL, Zhang, Z, Peng, RH, Xiong, AS, and Chen, JM (2009). OsHSF7 gene in rice, Oryza sativa L., encodes a transcription factor that functions as a high temperature receptive and responsive factor. BMB Rep. 42, 16-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Livak, KJ, and Schmittgen, TD (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 25, 402-408.
  22. Lopes-Caitar, VS, de Carvalho, MCCG, Darben, LM, Kuwahara, MK, Nepomuceno, AL, and Dias, WP (2013). Genome-wide analysis of the Hsp20 gene family in soybean: comprehensive sequence, genomic organization and expression profile analysis under abiotic and biotic stresses. BMC Genomics. 14, 577.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Maere, S, Heymans, K, and Kuiper, M (2005). BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics. 21, 3448-3449.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Marino, D, Dunand, C, Puppo, A, and Pauly, N (2012). A burst of plant NADPH oxidases. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 9-15.
  25. Marioni, JC, Mason, CE, Mane, SM, Stephens, M, and Gilad, Y (2008). RNA-seq: An assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res. 18, 1509-1517.
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Mortazavi, A, Williams, BA, McCue, K, Schaeffer, L, and Wold, B (2008). Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 5, 621-628.
  27. Nakamoto, H, and Vigh, L (2006). The small heat shock proteins and their clients. Cell Mol Life Sci. 64, 294-306.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Narusaka, Y, Narusaka, M, Seki, M, Umezawa, T, Ishida, J, and Nakajima, M (2004). Crosstalk in the responses to abiotic and biotic stresses in Arabidopsis: Analysis of gene expression in cytochrome P450 gene superfamily by cDNA microarray. Plant Mol Biol. 55, 327-342.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Nover, N, Bharti, K, Döring, P, and Mishra, SK (2001). Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: how many heat stress transcription factors do we need?. Cell Stress Chaperones. 6, 177-189.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Pratt, WB, Morishima, Y, Peng, HM, and Osawa, Y (2010). Proposal for a role of the Hsp90/Hsp70-based chaperone machinery in making triage decisions when proteins undergo oxidative and toxic damage. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 235, 278-289.
  31. Qi, Y, Wang, H, Zou, Y, Liu, C, Liu, Y, and Wang, Y (2010). Over-expression of mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 suppresses programmed cell death in rice. FEBS Lett. 585, 231-239.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Queitsch, C, Hong, SW, Vierling, E, and Lindquist, S (2000). Heat shock protein 101 plays a crucial role in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 12, 479-492.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Rapaport, F, Khanin, R, Liang, Y, Pirun, M, Krek, A, and Zumbo, P (2013). Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biology. 14, R95.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Rhoads, DM, White, SJ, Zhou, Y, Muralidharan, M, and Elthon, TE (2005). Altered gene expression in plants with constitutive expression of a mitochondrial small heat shock protein suggests the involvement of retrograde regulation in the heat stress response. Physiol Plant. 123, 435-444.
  35. Robinson, MD, and Oshlack, A (2010). A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 11, R25.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  36. Sarkar, NK, Kim, YK, and Grover, A (2009). Rice sHsp genes: genomic organization and expression profiling under stress and development. BMC Genomics. 10, 393.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Schöffl, F, Prändl, R, and Reindl, A (1998). Regulation of the heat-shock response. Plant Physiol. 117, 1135-1141.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Shen, C, Li, D, He, R, Fang, Z, Xia, Y, and Gao, J (2014). Comparative transcriptome analysis of RNA-seq data for cold-tolerant and cold-sensitive rice genotypes under cold stress. J Plant Biol. 57, 337-348.
  39. Sun, L, Liu, Y, Kong, X, Zhang, D, Pan, J, and Zhou, Y (2012). ZmHSP16.9, a cytosolic class I small heat shock protein in maize (Zea mays), confers heat tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 31, 1473-1484.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Swindell, WR, Huebner, M, and Weber, AP (2007). Transcriptional profiling of Arabidopsis heat shock proteins and transcription factors reveals extensive overlap between heat and non-heat stress response pathways. BMC Genomics. 8, 125.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Wang, Z, Gerstein, M, and Snyder, M (2009). RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 10, 57-63.
  42. Xu, J, Xue, C, Xue, D, Zhao, J, Gai, J, and Guo, N (2013). Overexpression of Gmhsp90s, a heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) gene family cloning from soybean, decrease damage of abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE. 8, e69810.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Xu, ZS, Li, ZY, Chen, Y, Chen, M, Li, LC, and Ma, YZ (2012). Heat shock protein 90 in plants: molecular mechanisms and roles in stress responses. Int J Mol Sci. 13, 15706-15723.
  44. Yamada, K, Fukao, Y, Hayashi, M, Fukazawa, M, Suzuki, I, and Nishimura, M (2007). Cytosolic hsp90 regulates the heat shock response that is responsible for heat acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem. 282, 37794-37804.
    Pubmed CrossRef

December 2018, 6 (4)
Full Text(PDF) Free
Supplementary File

Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)

Social Network Service
  • Science Central